Thursday, April 26, 2007

Do You Think...

They guy that invented the charity "The March of Dimes" is kicking himself for not calling it "The March of Dollars"?

It seems a bit short sighted, especially in the escallating realm of health care costs. Perhaps it is wise to inflation adjust your organization's name now and then.

How will Dollar General survive as the dollar plummets against foreign currency? Pretty soon you'll get a handshake and a cup of flour for that buck.

It was like all of the businesses that wanted to sound all cool and futuristic, calling themseleves "Salon 2000" or "Electronics 2000". Back then, you were the cat's bananas. Now, unless you want a Jennifer Aniston "Friends" haircut or a portable CD player you are screwed!

What's in a name? A lot. Think hard, think timelessly.

Saturday, April 21, 2007

More Creationist Bullshit

I have become quite fond of podcasts. I have an Apple Nano, and it is so tiny that I use it everywhere. Today I was looking for a new science podcast over at iTunes and in the "Natural Science" category they have "Reasons to Believe- a Creation Update". We need this to go away.

It is not science. Why? Simple, it cannot change with the evidence. The theory of evolution certainly can and does. The evidence of creation does not exist, other than "because we say so". It is not hypothesis driven inquiry, it does not waiver with new evidence, it denies the utility of hard science and therefore is not science.

Please go to http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html and remind them that such things belong in "Religion and Spirituality" NOT in Natural Science.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

ARE YOU ALL HIGH?

Sorry, but approximately 50% of people are either stupid or don't understand why the USA was founded in the first place. I was reading the news this morning and an ABC poll asked if campuses needed stricter security. The results were:

No. Stricter security policies would violate privacy rights.
5,656

Yes. Officials should screen people to make sure they aren't carrying weapons.

4,804

I'm not sure. It depends on the school and its history of on-campus violence.

1,887
Total Vote: 12,347


Over half of those that respond do not understand that we are innocent until proven guilty and that tragedys like yesterday's are an inevitable facet of living in a free society. Grow a sack people!

Those who trade freedom for security get neither.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Making a Tragedy into a Bigger Tragedy

32 innocent people died yesterday, assassinated in cold blood by a crazed lone gunman. The tragedy at Virginia Tech is palpable across the nation, as the losses of young lives in a safe environment gives us all pause and hones our sense of perspective. The families and friends of those slain will suffer and the impact on the survivors will be devastating.

As usual, the onset of an unpredictable tragedy now has set in motion the two deleterious falicies that always seem to follow such events. First, the finger pointing. The media is in a frenzy about how the two sets of shootings were isolated by two hours yet the university did not go into "lockdown". They claim it would have saved lives and not allowed the massacre to continue. You can almost smell the hundreds of lawyers booking flights from NYC to Blacksburg VA. Lawsuits will be filed against the university, the president will be asked to resign, and the police will be questioned about their appropriate response.

Sorry, there's just one person to blame and he's dead. And of course, if the police did go into lockdown and notify all students, staff and faculty of a wandering gunman the pandemonium would have certainly had consequences as well. Plus, this is campus security in Blacksburg, VA. I think they were forced to make decisions above and beyond their training and expectations, and should be commended for their courage and a job well done.

The next deleterious falicy is the actions that will now be taken to "Secure our Campuses". You can see this one coming, another erosion of personal freedom and another notch up in the New World Odor. There have already been cries for heightened security in academic buildings, metal detectors installed, new training for elite university police forces.

One knucklehead suggested arming professors. Now I like professors, but I don't want someone to have to put down their pipe to address a crime in progress with a deadly weapon. I say lovingly that most professors I know (and I know many) are partially mentally ill and show affectations and compulsions that most people don't. The academic system breeds for this. Who else would work 80 hours a week and willingly deal with 20 year olds for shitty pay and no job security? They should not be armed, but bulletproof patches for the jacket sleeves may be a good compromise.

The most likely residue will be enhanced security checkpoints, card readers, limited access etc. This is horrible for the free scholarly environment that a university represents. It is important for students to stumble through hallways and smell the stench of science. They need to see the cool equipment and interact with the weirdos that gravitate to academic pursuit.

Another genius on TV suggested deporting all international students. Sorry, but if you did that the labs in engineering and science would be empty! The US pays a postdoc $30,000 a year-- these are people with Ph.D.s and years of experience. They are overwhelmingly from Asia because domestic students will not stay in these thankless careers.

Bottom line, the tragedy in Virginia Tech is awful as it stands. In our haste to make the pain go away (and insulate from liability) we'll now see dramatic remodeling of our freedoms to make everyone more comfortable. I didn't even mention the effect this will have on banning firearms.
This action was one idiot, a price paid for living in a free society. I'll take my chances with freedom. Pull out all the stops. If we're allowed to live strong and live free bad things will always happen along the way. However, it is critical that we not let these instances derail our misson and surrender irrevocable restrictions imposed to give us a false sense of security.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Sopranos Mania -- WTF?

HBO's miniseries "The Sopranos" has been revered as a masterpiece of television. I find it to be a master piece of shit. Rave reviews, awards, and notariety have surrounded this series since its inception sometime in January of 1999. Since then they have produced around 80 episodes-- not even one a month.

The writing is lazy, the characters are uninteresting and everyone I know says that is completely sucks. Every episode welcomes at least 6 new characters that come from nowhere and then disappear into nowhere without resolution. I know because Mrs. Schmootzie watches it every week and every week she tells me how much it blows.

My guess is that this is an elaborate experiment. How much can HBO get people to pay for something that is absolutely lame? Can they get people to buy something just by telling them how good it is? It works for Froot Loops.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

The Pope is an Ass.

The new pope, Pope Benedict, has made his first official pronouncements on evolution. His thoughts were not those of a scientist, but those of the head of a conspiracy devised to control information in a way that will keep the slaves humble and keep the dollars coming in.

Before he was pope he was Cardinal Ratzinger. I think "Ratzinger" was one of Batman's arch enemies in the old TV show. In this article

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070411/ap_on_re_eu/pope_evolution

he says you can't prove evolution. Perhaps it is impossible to do the test over millions of years, but you don't need to look farther than antibiotic resistant bacteria to see that evolution is still occurring. Therefore, evolution is a fact, it did and still does occur. In terms of human evolution, in the absence of a testable hypothesis we are stuck calling it a theory. However, the theory is supported by the vast proponderence of evidence.

Therefore, the likelihood of evolution being the mechanism leading to rise of man is a pretty solid bet.

It is funny that he says you can't prove evolution, but he is certain of gigantic floods that killed everything on the planet except for two of each species (including the 40000 species of ants, because there could not just be two ants that would be the basis for descent to all other ants- that would be evolution). He also knows of burning talking bushes, flying people, virgin births, dead dudes rising, talking snakes, making women from ribs, etc etc etc and there is not a shred of evidence to back these whackjob theories.

So Ratzinger, take a lesson from Pope Urban VII and back off of the scientists. You don't stand a chance. The earth is 3.5 billion years old, traveling around the sun (not in the center of the universe) and life evolved here through common descent.

Perhaps the best evidence of evolution on a societal scale is religion. It has failed to change with societal enlightenment and scientific progress, and if trends continue it will become extinct. I don't know if Ratzinger counted the numbers lately, but they ain't getting bigger, especially in the developed world. Maybe it is time to play his game in reality.

I guess that just isn't possible.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Where'd You Go Schmootzie?

I've been out of the Big Top and not able to keep up on this damn thing. It is not for lack of topics, it is for lack of becomming boring to myself and any potential readers.

I think I'm getting back into the groove, so watch for stuff to start happening again.

Schmootzie.